Wallace Stegners Wilderness Letter Essay -- Nature Conservation Essay

In Wallace Stegners Wilderness Letter, he is arguing that the countries natural state and forests ask to be saved. For a person to become whole, Stegner argues that the mere idea of the wild and the forests argon to thank. The wilderness needs to be saved for the sake of the idea. He insinuates that anyone in America can just think of Old faithful, Mt. Rainier, or any other spectacular landform, even if they turn in not visited there, and brought to a calm. These thoughts he argues are what makes us as volume whole.The wilderness can be used to measure against the man made world, a scientific yardstick. Throughout the entire snatch he is arguing that the importance is not what we can actually see or touch, but what we think of and how we think of the wild. This letter is being written to assert them of what would be missing without the wilderness. Those who think fondly of the Grand Canyon or the Everglades and have never been there are merely working from the idea, but those who have been there know what it has to offer and therefore receive the calming and sobering state of mind Stegner refers to.He believes that the wilderness has helped form us and that if we allow industrialisation to push through the people of our nation will have lost part of themselves they will have lost the part of themselves that was formed by the wilderness idea. Once the forests are destroyed they will have nothing to look back at or to remind them of where they came from or what was, and he argues everyone need to keep back all of what we have now.In Stegners perception, humans are the only wild species left. Humans are the only ones who have survived genetically unchanged. They are the ones who create the technological advan... ...rt of life as it once was and the acres of land to run on are few and far between, but losing that hasnt made people bitter. Humans make themselves bitter when they fill their days and the days of their children with activity after activity and dont stop and take time for for each one other.The entire letter was written on the premise that nature should be saved for the sake of the thought, not for what it could tactilely do for people. If you are going to have a clear-cut, concise idea about what nature is, enough of one for it to be a sobering idea, you would have to be out there in it at some point. You may have a thought but you dont know and therefore it isnt what is holding you together as a whole. The letter has some genuine concerns for the wildlife and forests and the wilderness itself, but it is just that, a letter voicing Wallace Stegners concerns.